Gallbladder carcinoma — and separating it from wall thickening that is not

USG · CT · MRI

First and second year — the floor first, then every step

Three patterns — a mass replacing the gallbladder, focal or diffuse wall thickening, an intraluminal polyp — then liver invasion, duct involvement and nodes; the hardest part is not calling xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis or adenomyomatosis cancer.

Orient first

  • Risk factors: gallstones (large), porcelain gallbladder, polyps ≥ 10 mm (verify the current polyp guidance), anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction.
  • Features favouring cancer: focal, asymmetric, irregular thickening with a disrupted mucosal line, direct liver invasion, and nodal disease.
  • Adenomyomatosis shows Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses (cystic spaces, comet-tail artefact) — a benign mimic.

Acquire the study

  • Curvilinear and high-frequency linear probe over the fundus; fasted.

The manoeuvre

  • Wall: focal or diffuse thickening in mm; is the inner mucosal line intact?
  • Polyps: size in mm, sessile vs pedunculated, internal colour Doppler flow.
  • Comet-tail reverberation in the wall = adenomyomatosis (benign).
  • Adjacent liver: loss of the interface, a hypoechoic mass extending from the fossa.

What confirms it

  • A mass or focal irregular wall thickening with liver invasion or nodal disease; histology confirms.

What licenses you to exclude it

  • Diffuse, smooth, symmetric thickening with an intact mucosal line in a patient with cholecystitis, heart failure or hypoalbuminaemia favours a benign cause.

The classic misread

  • Tumefactive sludge called a polyp — sludge moves with position change and has no flow.

More searches

More in Abdomen and pelvis