Staging cervical cancer on MRI (FIGO 2018)

MRI

First and second year — the floor first, then every step

On high-resolution T2 perpendicular to the cervix, measure the tumour, look for parametrial invasion (the dark stromal ring broken), then vagina, pelvic side wall, bladder and rectum, and nodes — FIGO 2018 lets imaging assign the stage.

Orient first

  • FIGO 2018 allows imaging and pathology to assign the stage, and made lymph node involvement stage IIIC (pelvic IIIC1, para-aortic IIIC2) — verify against the current FIGO wording.
  • Size thresholds (for example 2 and 4 cm within stage IB) matter for fertility-sparing surgery and chemoradiation.
  • Parametrial invasion is the key decision: an intact low-signal stromal ring on T2 makes it very unlikely; invasion moves the patient from surgery to chemoradiation.

Acquire the study

  • Pelvic MRI with small field-of-view T2 perpendicular and parallel to the cervical canal, sagittal T2, DWI; vaginal gel as local practice; large field-of-view to the renal hila for nodes and hydronephrosis.

The manoeuvre

  • Sagittal T2: tumour size in three planes in mm, and extension into the uterine body and vagina (upper two-thirds versus lower third).
  • Oblique axial T2 perpendicular to the cervix: integrity of the low-signal stromal ring — a full-thickness break with spiculated tumour into the parametrium indicates invasion.
  • Pelvic side wall and ureters: hydronephrosis (stage IIIB).
  • Bladder and rectal mucosa on sagittal T2: loss of the fat plane alone is not invasion; mucosal involvement is stage IVA.
  • DWI and T2: pelvic and para-aortic nodes, short axis in mm.

What confirms it

  • A FIGO 2018 stage with the size and each extension feature stated.

What licenses you to exclude it

  • An intact stromal ring on thin-section T2 makes parametrial invasion very unlikely.

The classic misread

  • Over-calling parametrial invasion from peritumoural oedema after a biopsy or cone.

See it on real cases

Direct links to Radiopaedia — the reference article and worked cases with their images. Each opens on Radiopaedia.

Key papers

Reviews and guidelines from RSNA, ESR and related journals. Each opens at its DOI.

  1. 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging ↗Salib MY, Russell JHB, Stewart VR, et al. · RadioGraphics 2020RSNA · PubMed
  2. 2018 FIGO Staging System for Uterine Cervical Cancer: Enter Cross-sectional Imaging ↗Lee SI, Atri M · Radiology 2019RSNA · PubMed
  3. Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018 ↗Manganaro L, Lakhman Y, Bharwani N, et al. · European Radiology 2021ESR · PubMed
  4. Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Practical Approach Using MRI and FDG PET ↗Lakhman Y, Aherne EA, Jayaprakasam VS, et al. · AJR 2023ARRS · PubMed

More searches

More in Women’s and fetal