Early ischaemic stroke on non-contrast CT

CT

First and second year — the floor first, then every step

The first job is to exclude haemorrhage. The second is to find early ischaemic change, which needs a narrow stroke window, not the standard one.

Orient first

  • The immediate question before thrombolysis is HAEMORRHAGE, not infarct. Answer that first and communicate it.
  • Early ischaemic change is a subtle LOSS OF GREY–WHITE DIFFERENTIATION caused by cytotoxic oedema. It is a density difference of only a few Hounsfield units, which is why the standard brain window hides it.
  • A NARROW window (roughly 30–40 window width, centre around 35) exaggerates that small difference and makes early change visible. Reading a stroke CT on a standard window is the commonest reason early change is missed.
  • A normal CT in acute stroke is expected and does not argue against the diagnosis.

Acquire the study

  • Non-contrast CT head, thin slices, reviewed on BOTH the standard brain window and a narrow stroke window.
  • Compare the two hemispheres SIDE BY SIDE at the same level, symmetrically — the diagnosis is made by asymmetry.
  • Know the time from onset; it changes what you expect to see and what can be offered.

The manoeuvre

  • Exclude haemorrhage first: intraparenchymal, subarachnoid, subdural, extradural, intraventricular.
  • Switch to the narrow stroke window.
  • Look for loss of the INSULAR RIBBON — the insular cortex losing its distinction from adjacent white matter.
  • Look for obscuration of the LENTIFORM NUCLEUS.
  • Look for cortical sulcal effacement and loss of grey–white differentiation in each vascular territory.
  • Look for a HYPERDENSE VESSEL sign — dense MCA, or the dot sign in a sylvian branch — and compare with the contralateral vessel before calling it, since a high haematocrit makes all vessels dense.
  • Score the extent (for example ASPECTS in the anterior circulation) if that is the local protocol, and state the territory involved.
  • Look for established infarction, old infarcts, and small-vessel disease that alter the interpretation.
  • Assess for mass effect and midline shift.

What confirms it

  • Loss of grey–white differentiation in a vascular territory, asymmetrical to the other side, on a narrow window.
  • A hyperdense vessel supports large-vessel occlusion but is neither necessary nor sufficient.

What licenses you to exclude it

  • ⚠️ A NORMAL NON-CONTRAST CT DOES NOT EXCLUDE ACUTE STROKE — it is the expected finding in the first hours, and it is exactly the patient who should be treated. Never write anything that implies otherwise.
  • What the study does exclude, when adequate, is haemorrhage.
  • Diffusion-weighted MRI is the test that positively excludes acute infarction.

The classic misread

  • Reading the study only on the standard brain window.
  • Reporting "no acute infarct" in a way a clinician reads as "not a stroke".
  • Calling a hyperdense MCA without comparing sides.
  • Missing an old infarct and attributing the deficit to it.

Reference values

Each value carries the caveat that keeps it from being misused. Normal limits and diagnostic criteria are kept apart on purpose: a disease cut-off read as a normal range is the more dangerous mistake.

Diagnostic criteria

  • Middle cerebral artery territory · ASPECTS — how to report it

    a named score: 10 regions of the MCA territory on non-contrast CT, one point deducted per region showing early ischaemic change; 10 is normal

    Thrombectomy-trial entry criteria have used various cut-offs (commonly 6 or more), and the large-core trials extended treatment below them — quote the score and let the current pathway apply its own threshold. Score on thin-slice review with strict windowing; old infarcts do not count. Versioned criterion — verify against the current edition before clinical use.

    CT

See it on real cases

Direct links to Radiopaedia — the reference article and worked cases with their images. Each opens on Radiopaedia.

Key papers

Reviews and guidelines from RSNA, ESR and related journals. Each opens at its DOI.

  1. CT for Treatment Selection in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Code Stroke Primer ↗Potter CA, Vagal AS, Goyal M, et al. · RadioGraphics 2019RSNA · PubMed
  2. Imaging of acute ischemic stroke ↗Rudkin S, Cerejo R, Tayal A, et al. · Emergency Radiology 2018ASER · PubMed
  3. Controversies in Imaging of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review ↗de Oliveira EP, Fiebach JB, Vagal A, et al. · AJR 2021ARRS · PubMed
  4. Location-Specific ASPECTS Paradigm in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ↗Seyedsaadat SM, Neuhaus AA, Pederson JM, et al. · AJNR 2020ASNR · PubMed
  5. CT Hyperdense Artery Sign and the Effect of Alteplase in Endovascular Thrombectomy after Acute Stroke ↗Zhou Y, Jing Y, Ospel J, et al. · Radiology 2022RSNA · PubMed

More searches

More in Acute and on-call